Background Image
如何赢得瘟疫之源与魔蛇之拥的对抗赛瘟疫之源 is in the a tier of champions

瘟疫之源 vs 魔蛇之拥

如何在LoL中以瘟疫之源的身份击败魔蛇之拥瘟疫之源 is in the s tier of champions
MarksmanAssassin
Mage

如何击败魔蛇之拥成为瘟疫之源

based on 1,450 瘟疫之源 vs 魔蛇之拥 matchups
胜率
49.2 %
kda
2.37
受欢迎度
1 %

How We Analyze LoL Champion Counters

We at MOBA Champion summarize millions of recently ranked LoL rounds each and every week. In our dataset, 瘟疫之源 did battle with 魔蛇之拥 in 1450 games. With so many matchups for 瘟疫之源 versus 魔蛇之拥 gives us a lot of confidence in our capability to produce actionable data and a solid build to destroy your rival. This particular counter matchup is relatively rare. 瘟疫之源 is forced to battle against 魔蛇之拥 in only 1.0% of his games.

瘟疫之源 vs 魔蛇之拥 Matchup Summary

Unfortunately, 瘟疫之源 does a dismal job of beating 魔蛇之拥. On average, he wins a acceptable 49.2% of matches the champions clash against one another in. In 瘟疫之源 versus 魔蛇之拥 games, 瘟疫之源’s team is 0.1% more likely to gain first blood. This indicates that he probably will get first blood versus 魔蛇之拥.

counterTitle

物品

第一项

期望时间
多兰之戒生命药水

下一个项目

5分钟
十字镐反曲之弓

Core 瘟疫之源 Items

22分钟
智慧末刃破败王者之刃界弓

可选项目

灭世者的死亡之帽无尽之刃鬼索的狂暴之刃卢安娜的飓风

Summoner Spells

summonerflash summoner spell D
summonerhaste summoner spell F

技能顺序

为瘟疫之源提升等级的第一个技能e
>
为瘟疫之源提供的第二种能力,以提高水平q
>
瘟疫之源 最大化的最后一项技能w

符文

精密致命节奏气定神闲传说:欢欣致命一击
主宰血之滋味寻宝猎人
Attack SpeedAdaptive ForceArmor
瘟疫之源's passive ability p
瘟疫之源's q ability q
瘟疫之源's w ability w
瘟疫之源's e ability e
瘟疫之源's ultimate ability r
1
Q
2
E
3
W
4
E
5
E
6
R
7
E
8
Q
9
E
10
Q
11
R
12
Q
13
Q
14
W
15
W
16
R

Guide to Countering 魔蛇之拥 as 瘟疫之源

Tips for Playing as 瘟疫之源 against 魔蛇之拥

- 【E毒性爆发】范围很大,在使用之前尽量给对手多叠几层【死亡毒液】。

- 你可以用【W剧毒之桶】来追上那些超出射程的敌人。

- 图奇是游戏中最高攻击速度的英雄之一,尽量购买像黑色切割者、或智慧末刃等带有攻击附带效果的道具。

Advice to Win Against 魔蛇之拥

- 当你已经中了卡西奥佩娅的毒时,要小心她的双生毒牙。

- 当她施放石化凝视时,你要背对她,这样只会被减速而不会被晕眩。

瘟疫之源 vs 魔蛇之拥 Counter Stats

瘟疫之源 Image
winRate
49.2 %
VS
winRate
50.8 %
魔蛇之拥 Image
8.6
< kills >
7
6.8
< deaths >
6.6
7.5
< assists >
6.3
1.97
< killingSprees >
1.63
147
< cs >
176
0.19
< dragons >
0.13
0.45
< inhibitors >
0.46
16,405
< physicalDamage >
657
3,625
< magicDamage >
22,408
4,618
< trueDamage >
330
24,648
< damageDealt >
23,395
21,872
< damageTaken >
27,796
12,354
< goldEarned >
11,894
2.08
< towers >
1.88
0.04
< barons >
0.04
4,888
< heal >
7,101
12,797
< xp >
15,366
21
< visionScore >
18
10
< wardsPlaced >
9
319
< ccTime >
446

How to Counter 魔蛇之拥 with 瘟疫之源 in LoL

The stat comparisons shown here underscore several vital 瘟疫之源 versus 魔蛇之拥 counter statistics that may help you understand the differences between the two. 瘟疫之源’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is more than 魔蛇之拥’s ratio of NaN, showing that 瘟疫之源 may be more central to his team's team fighting effectiveness than 魔蛇之拥..

瘟疫之源 normally has a slightly larger longest kill spree than his opponent does. On average, he receives less damage than 魔蛇之拥. This typically indicates differing health capacities, yet it can also indicate that the champion with increased HP has less agility and thus is unable to kite away from additional damage when engaged or poked.

championDifferences.title

伤害数据

瘟疫之源
魔蛇之拥
物理伤害
魔法伤害
真实伤害

championDifferences.playStyle.title

瘟疫之源
魔蛇之拥

championDifferences.whoIsBetter

Both League champs are great champions. Both champs have their strengths, weaknesses, and counters. In League's current meta, 瘟疫之源 usually fairs equally well when trying to fight 魔蛇之拥, with a 49.2% win rate. Therefore, 瘟疫之源 makes an ok counter for 魔蛇之拥.

While 瘟疫之源 does have a lower winrate than 魔蛇之拥, when on opposite teams, 瘟疫之源 also has a much lower learning curve that makes him a less time consuming champion to develop with. You should be careful when picking 瘟疫之源 into 魔蛇之拥.

Moreover, 瘟疫之源 also has almost no amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to 魔蛇之拥. This often makes her just as valuable during team fights, especially when trying to counter champions with a ton of burst damage.

While there isn't one best champion overall in League of Legends, in 瘟疫之源 vs 魔蛇之拥 matchups, 魔蛇之拥 is the better champ with a similar win rate, less champion complexity, and a similar amount of utility to help out your allied champions during teamfights.

瘟疫之源 is a somewhat poor counter for 魔蛇之拥. You will do well by focussing your tactics on keeping up your CS and destroying objectives. If you do that, you should be able to stand on your own as 瘟疫之源 against 魔蛇之拥.

additionalInformation.title

method.title2

method.text2

additionalInformation.resources

additionalInformation.readMore

To learn all of the intricacies of 瘟疫之源 to counter 魔蛇之拥 during both the laning and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should keep reading to gather a few extra tricks and insights into this matchup. If you pay attention to the build and stats presented here, you should increase your win rate significantly and be closer to League of Legends pro players.

瘟疫之源 usually accumulates a similar amount of CS relative to 魔蛇之拥. Champs who on average don't acquire much CS often don't have to have much CS to be effective, such as supports. They are capable of scaling well off of their skills, stats, and first items alone. Yet, champions with large amounts of CS, such as hyper-carries, typically have to have a lot of items to be effective. In either situation, try to exceed the values displayed here to do well.

The top items to prioritize in your 瘟疫之源 versus 魔蛇之拥 build include 智慧末刃, 破败王者之刃, and 界弓. When 瘟疫之源 used at least these three items in his build, he performed much better versus 魔蛇之拥 than with most other common builds. In fact, 瘟疫之源 boasted an average win rate of 49.2% when countering 魔蛇之拥 with this build.

To have the best likelihood of vanquishing 魔蛇之拥 as 瘟疫之源, you should use the 致命节奏, 气定神闲, 传说:欢欣, 致命一击, 血之滋味, and 寻宝猎人 runes from the 精密 and 主宰 rune sets. Out of all the runes players chose for 瘟疫之源 vs 魔蛇之拥 battles, this mix of runes resulted in the greatest win rate. Notably, these runes provided a 49.2% winrate overall.

If you want to see 瘟疫之源 vs 魔蛇之拥 tips and counter stats for a a distinct player tier, feel free to select one from the selection menu above. At first, the stats and guides given are calculated using every game with data with both champions.