Background Image
如何赢得机械先驱与卡牌大师的对抗赛机械先驱 is in the s tier of champions

机械先驱 vs 卡牌大师

如何在LoL中以机械先驱的身份击败卡牌大师机械先驱 is in the a tier of champions
Mage
Mage

如何击败卡牌大师成为机械先驱

based on 2,173 机械先驱 vs 卡牌大师 matchups
胜率
50.3 %
kda
2.55
受欢迎度
4 %

How We Analyze LoL Champion Counters

At MOBA Champion, we summarize millions of recently ranked League games every week. In our data, 机械先驱 did battle with 卡牌大师 2173 times. Using so many games with 机械先驱 versus 卡牌大师 provides us faith in our ability to provide informative statistics and a supported build to destroy your enemy. This pairing is somewhat rare. 机械先驱 fights 卡牌大师 in only 4.0% of his games.

机械先驱 vs 卡牌大师 Matchup Summary

机械先驱 has done a average job of countering 卡牌大师. Normally, he wins a acceptable 50.3% of matches the champs clash against each other in. In 机械先驱 versus 卡牌大师 rounds, 机械先驱’s team is 0.0% more expected to obtain first blood. This implies that he most likely will be able to get first blood against 卡牌大师.

counterTitle

物品

第一项

期望时间
多兰之戒生命药水

下一个项目

5分钟
增幅典籍海克斯科技发电机

Core 机械先驱 Items

22分钟
灭世者的死亡之帽中娅沙漏影焰

可选项目

巫妖之祸风暴狂涌卢登的伙伴兰德里的折磨

Summoner Spells

summonerflash summoner spell D
summonerteleport summoner spell F

技能顺序

为机械先驱提升等级的第一个技能e
>
为机械先驱提供的第二种能力,以提高水平q
>
机械先驱 最大化的最后一项技能w

符文

启迪先攻神奇之鞋饼干配送星界洞悉
巫术法力流系带超然
Attack SpeedAdaptive ForceMagic Resist
机械先驱's passive ability p
机械先驱's q ability q
机械先驱's w ability w
机械先驱's e ability e
机械先驱's ultimate ability r
1
Q
2
E
3
E
4
W
5
E
6
R
7
E
8
Q
9
E
10
Q
11
R
12
Q
13
Q
14
W
15
W
16
R

Guide to Countering 卡牌大师 as 机械先驱

Tips for Playing as 机械先驱 against 卡牌大师

- 确保你在正确的时刻选择了正确的技能增强。

- 【E死亡射线】是一个给力的磨血技能,以及强大的区域封锁工具。将它与【W重力场】组合使用,来控制敌人的走位。

Advice to Win Against 卡牌大师

- 当你的英雄没有生命值时,早点躲避万能牌的攻击。

- 如果你的生命值很低,小心敌方的崔斯特使用命运技能来击杀你。

机械先驱 vs 卡牌大师 Counter Stats

机械先驱 Image
winRate
50.3 %
VS
winRate
49.7 %
卡牌大师 Image
6.9
< kills >
5.9
5.5
< deaths >
6.3
7.1
< assists >
7.8
1.57
< killingSprees >
1.38
192
< cs >
179
0.07
< dragons >
0.09
0.49
< inhibitors >
0.51
576
< physicalDamage >
2,485
26,303
< magicDamage >
18,223
730
< trueDamage >
754
27,610
< damageDealt >
21,463
18,934
< damageTaken >
23,324
12,535
< goldEarned >
12,889
2.07
< towers >
2.28
0.03
< barons >
0.03
1,782
< heal >
3,393
15,339
< xp >
14,980
19
< visionScore >
19
9
< wardsPlaced >
9
279
< ccTime >
181

How to Counter 卡牌大师 with 机械先驱 in LoL

The stat comparisons shown here highlight several important 机械先驱 versus 卡牌大师 counter statistics that may help us understand the distinctions between the pair. As an example, 机械先驱’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is better than 卡牌大师’s KDA ratio of NaN, indicating that 机械先驱 may be more central to his team's team fighting effectiveness than 卡牌大师..

机械先驱 often has a similar longest killing spree as his enemy does. On average, he takes less damage than 卡牌大师. This often reflects different amounts of tankyness; however, it can also imply that the one champion has less mobility and thus is not able to kite away from additional damage when engaged or poked.

championDifferences.title

伤害数据

机械先驱
卡牌大师
物理伤害
魔法伤害
真实伤害

championDifferences.playStyle.title

机械先驱
卡牌大师

championDifferences.whoIsBetter

Both LoL champions are great. Both champs have their pros and cons. In League's current meta, 机械先驱 usually fairs equally well when playing against 卡牌大师, with a 50.3% win rate. Therefore, 机械先驱 makes an ok counter to 卡牌大师.

While 机械先驱 does have a higher win rate than 卡牌大师, when facing one another, 机械先驱 also has a greater level of difficulty that makes him a more complex character to develop with. You should be careful when picking 机械先驱 into 卡牌大师as his relative depth means that you may not be able to reach his full potential without a significant amount of practice beforehand.

Moreover, 机械先驱 also has almost no amount of CC and other utility, a similar amount to 卡牌大师. This makes her just as valuable during teamfights, especially when facing champions with a ton of burst damage.

While there isn't one best champion for every situation in League of Legends, in 机械先驱 vs 卡牌大师 matchups, 机械先驱 is the better champion with a similar win rate, similar champion depth, and a similar amount of utility to help out your teammates during late stage team fights.

机械先驱 is a decent counter to 卡牌大师. Focus your actions on maximizing your gold income and clearing objectives. If you do that, you should do very well as 机械先驱 against 卡牌大师.

additionalInformation.title

method.title2

method.text2

additionalInformation.resources

additionalInformation.readMore

To learn all of the intricacies of 机械先驱 in order to counter 卡牌大师 during both the laning and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should keep reading to learn a few extra lessons on this matchup. If you mind the build and tips shown here, you will grow your win rate by a lot and be closer to League of Legends pro players.

机械先驱 most often racks up a similar amount of CS relative to 卡牌大师. Champs who typically don't get much CS often don't need much CS to be effective, such as sup champs. They are able to scale well off of their abilities and first items alone. Yet, champs with a lot of CS, such as hyper-carries, typically require several high cost items to be effective. In either situation, try to do better than the numbers shown here to do well.

The ideal items to have in your 机械先驱 versus 卡牌大师 build consist of 灭世者的死亡之帽, 中娅沙漏, and 影焰. When 机械先驱 used at least these three items in his build, he did a lot better against 卡牌大师 than with many other commonly used builds. In fact, 机械先驱 boasted an average winrate of 50.3% when countering 卡牌大师 with this counter build.

To have the greatest likelihood of coming out on top against 卡牌大师 as 机械先驱, you should take the 先攻, 神奇之鞋, 饼干配送, 星界洞悉, 法力流系带, and 超然 runes from the 启迪 and 巫术 rune sets. Of all the runes that we analyzed for 机械先驱 vs 卡牌大师 battles, this sequence of runes resulted in the best win rate. Notably, these runes gave a 50.3% winrate overall.

If you would like to view 机械先驱 vs 卡牌大师 tips and counter builds for a an individual rank, feel free to choose one from the selection menu shown above. If viewing for the first time, the statistics and strategies shown are computed using all rounds finished with both champions.