Скарнер не может сильно вам навредить даже на среднем расстоянии. Пользуйтесь этим.
Пока щит от Кристаллического экзоскелета держится, скорость передвижения Скарнера увеличена. Атакуйте его, чтобы замедлить.
Скарнер особенно опасен, когда находится в зоне усиления Кристаллических игл, захваченных его командой. Старайтесь захватывать их заранее, если поблизости от них может начаться битва.
The stat comparisons provided here emphasize some strategic Сетт vs. Скарнер matchup statistics that may help us grasp the differences between these two champs. As an example, Сетт’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is greater than Скарнер’s ratio of NaN, demonstrating that Сетт may be more central to his team's team fighting capacity than Скарнер..
Сетт usually has a similar longest kill spree as his matchup does. Typically, he takes more damage than Скарнер. This commonly reflects differing health capacities; however, it can also indicate that the one champ has less mobility and thus is not able to kite away from further damage when engaged or poked.
Both League champions are great. Both have their strengths, weaknesses, and counters. In League's current meta, Сетт usually wins when facing off against Скарнер, with a 53.0% win rate. Thus, Сетт makes a good counter for Скарнер.
While Сетт does have a higher win rate than Скарнер, when they face off with one another, Сетт also has a lower learning curve that makes him a less complex champ to develop with. You don't need to be too worried when picking Сетт into Скарнер.
Additionally, Сетт has almost no amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to Скарнер. This often makes her just as valuable during teamfights, especially when trying to counter champions with a lot of burst damage.
While there is not one best champion for every situation in League of Legends, in Сетт vs Скарнер matchups, Сетт is the better champ with a noticably higher win rate, less champion complexity, and a similar amount of utility to help out your allies during teamfights.
Сетт is an above average counter to Скарнер. You will do well by focussing your gameplay on maximizing your CS and destroying objectives. If you are able to do that, you should hold your own as Сетт against Скарнер.
If you would like to truly master Сетт in order to counter Скарнер during both the laning and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should keep reading to learn a few extra tricks and insights into this matchup. If you mind the build and suggestions presented above, you will increase your win rate significantly and be closer to League of Legends pro players.
Сетт usually racks up much more CS compared to Скарнер. Champs who on average don't acquire many minion kills usualy don't require much CS to be valuable teammates, such as supports. These kinds of champions are capable of scaling well off of their skills, stats, and first items alone. Yet, champs with a lot of CS, such as hyper-carries, typically require several high cost items to be effective. In either case, try to exceed the values reported here to do well.
The most crucial items to use in your Сетт versus Скарнер build include Сердце стали, Испытание Стерака, and Титаническая гидра. When Сетт used at least these three pieces in his build, he did a lot better vs. Скарнер than with many other typical item sets. In fact, Сетт boasted an average winrate of 53.0% when countering Скарнер with this counter build.
To have the highest probability of beating Скарнер as Сетт, you should use the Завоеватель, Триумф, Легенда: рвение, Последний рубеж, Второе дыхание, and Неустрашимость runes from the Точность and Храбрость rune sets. Out of all the rune combinations we have analyed for Сетт vs Скарнер counter picks, this mix of runes yielded the highest win rate. Notably, these runes averaged a 53.0% win rate overall.
If you need to see Сетт vs Скарнер tips and counter stats for a a particular division rank, feel free to select one from the selection menu above. By default, the stats and build suggestions shown are calculated using every round finished with both champs.