愁云使者 vs 沙漠玫瑰
如何击败沙漠玫瑰成为愁云使者
based on 3,392 愁云使者 vs 沙漠玫瑰 matchupsHow We Analyze LoL Champion Counters
愁云使者 vs 沙漠玫瑰 Matchup Summary
counterTitle
物品
第一项
下一个项目
Core 愁云使者 Items
可选项目
Summoner Spells
技能顺序
符文
愁云使者 vs 沙漠玫瑰 Counter Stats
How to Counter 沙漠玫瑰 with 愁云使者 in LoL
The stats shown on this page feature some influential 愁云使者 versus 沙漠玫瑰 counter statistics that may help us explain the differences and similarities between the pair. 愁云使者’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is greater than 沙漠玫瑰’s KDA ratio of NaN, showing that 愁云使者 may be more central to their team's team fighting capability than 沙漠玫瑰..
愁云使者 usually has a slightly smaller longest kill spree than their matchup does. Commonly, they receives less damage than 沙漠玫瑰. This is usually reflective of different amounts of tankyness, yet it can also hint that the champion with more HP has less agility and thus is not able to escape additional harm when poked or engaged.
championDifferences.title
伤害数据
championDifferences.playStyle.title
championDifferences.whoIsBetter
Both LoL champs are great champions. Both champs have their strengths, weaknesses, and counters. In the game's current meta, 愁云使者 usually fairs equally well when trying to fight 沙漠玫瑰, with a 50.3% win rate. As a result, 愁云使者 makes an ok counter for 沙漠玫瑰.
While 愁云使者 does have a higher win rate than 沙漠玫瑰, when facing one another, 愁云使者 also has a much lower difficulty level that makes them a less challenging champion to learn and master. You should be careful when picking 愁云使者 into 沙漠玫瑰.
Furthermore, 愁云使者 has some amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to 沙漠玫瑰. This makes her just as valuable during teamfights, especially when trying to counter champions with a ton of burst damage.
While there isn't one best champion in League of Legends, in 愁云使者 vs 沙漠玫瑰 matchups, 愁云使者 is the better champ with a similar win rate, less champion complexity, and a similar amount of utility to help out your team members during team fights.
愁云使者 is a decent counter to 沙漠玫瑰. Make sure you focus your strategy on keeping up your gold income and destroying objectives. If you can do that, you should do very well as 愁云使者 against 沙漠玫瑰.
Other Champion Matchups Against 愁云使者
Top Synergies by Role
additionalInformation.title
method.title2
additionalInformation.resources
additionalInformation.readMore
If you would like to truly master 愁云使者 in order to counter 沙漠玫瑰 during both the lane and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should keep reading to gather a few extra tips and tricks for this matchup. If you listen to the build and tips presented above, you will grow your win rate significantly and be closer to League of Legends pro players.
愁云使者 on average picks up a similar amount of CS relative to 沙漠玫瑰. Champions who typically don't get many minion kills often don't need much CS to be valuable teammates, such as supports. These kinds of champions are capable of scaling well off of their abilities and first items alone. Yet, champs with a lot of CS, such as hyper-carries, typically need a lot of items to be effective. In either situation, try to do better than the numbers shown here to do well.
The top items to use in your 愁云使者 versus 沙漠玫瑰 build consist of 灭世者的死亡之帽, 影焰, and 卢登的伙伴. When 愁云使者 bought at least these three items in their build, they did a lot better vs 沙漠玫瑰 than with most other typical builds. In fact, 愁云使者 had an average winrate of 50.3% when playing against 沙漠玫瑰 with these items in their kit.
To have the highest likelihood of coming out on top against 沙漠玫瑰 as 愁云使者, 愁云使者 players should equip the 电刑, 血之滋味, 眼球收集器, 终极猎人, 法力流系带, and 超然 runes from the 主宰 and 巫术 rune sets. Out of all the rune combinations players chose for 愁云使者 vs 沙漠玫瑰 face-offs, this blending of runes yielded the best win rate. In fact, these runes averaged a 50.3% winrate overall.
If you want to get 愁云使者 versus 沙漠玫瑰 tips and matchup stats and build suggestions for a a specific rank, feel free to select one from the selection menu above. By default, the statistics and build suggestions shown are calculated using every game with data with both champs.