Background Image
如何赢得愁云使者与披甲龙龟的对抗赛愁云使者 is in the b tier of champions

愁云使者 vs 披甲龙龟

如何在LoL中以愁云使者的身份击败披甲龙龟愁云使者 is in the a tier of champions
Mage
TankFighter

如何击败披甲龙龟成为愁云使者

based on 1,273 愁云使者 vs 披甲龙龟 matchups
胜率
47.1 %
kda
2.34
受欢迎度
1.7 %

How We Analyze LoL Champion Counters

We produce our counter stats from the millions of recently ranked LoL games that we evaluate every week. Our guide on how to beat 披甲龙龟 as 愁云使者 came out of an examination of 1273 ranked rounds where both champions battled one another. This particular champion pairing is fairly rare. 愁云使者 is forced to battle against 披甲龙龟 in only 1.7% of their rounds.

愁云使者 vs 披甲龙龟 Matchup Summary

Unfortunately, 愁云使者 does a below average job of beating 披甲龙龟. On average, they wins a lowly 47.1% of games the champions clash against each other in. In 愁云使者 vs 披甲龙龟 rounds, 愁云使者’s side is 0.0% more expected to obtain first blood. This implies that they most likely will be able to get first blood versus 披甲龙龟.

counterTitle

物品

第一项

期望时间
多兰之戒生命药水

下一个项目

5分钟
增幅典籍荧尘

Core 愁云使者 Items

22分钟
灭世者的死亡之帽风暴狂涌卢登的伙伴

可选项目

影焰残疫中娅沙漏

Summoner Spells

summonerflash summoner spell D
summonerdot summoner spell F

技能顺序

为愁云使者提升等级的第一个技能q
>
为愁云使者提供的第二种能力,以提高水平w
>
愁云使者 最大化的最后一项技能e

符文

主宰电刑血之滋味眼球收集器终极猎人
巫术法力流系带超然
Attack SpeedAdaptive ForceMagic Resist
愁云使者's passive ability p
愁云使者's q ability q
愁云使者's w ability w
愁云使者's e ability e
愁云使者's ultimate ability r
1
E
2
Q
3
W
4
Q
5
Q
6
R
7
Q
8
W
9
Q
10
W
11
R
12
W
13
W
14
E
15
E
16
R

Guide to Countering 披甲龙龟 as 愁云使者

Advice to Win Against 披甲龙龟

- 拉莫斯通常会堆高护甲,在他没有用尖刺防御时,把他留给法师来解决吧。

- 在拉莫斯不使用尖刺防御时攻击他,因为拉莫斯不用此技能时,他的属性要远低于一般的坦克英雄。

愁云使者 vs 披甲龙龟 Counter Stats

愁云使者 Image
winRate
47.1 %
VS
winRate
52.9 %
披甲龙龟 Image
7.2
< kills >
4.1
6.4
< deaths >
5.7
7.8
< assists >
11.4
1.67
< killingSprees >
0.9
155
< cs >
33
0.07
< dragons >
1.17
0.42
< inhibitors >
0.38
1,377
< physicalDamage >
2,322
22,555
< magicDamage >
11,402
934
< trueDamage >
752
24,866
< damageDealt >
14,476
19,665
< damageTaken >
31,839
11,420
< goldEarned >
10,609
1.83
< towers >
1.16
0.02
< barons >
0.33
2,238
< heal >
12,483
14,029
< xp >
13,029
19
< visionScore >
20
9
< wardsPlaced >
7
558
< ccTime >
578

How to Counter 披甲龙龟 with 愁云使者 in LoL

The stat comparisons provided here clarify some important 愁云使者 versus 披甲龙龟 matchup statistics that can help you appreciate the differences between the two. For instance, 愁云使者’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is more than 披甲龙龟’s ratio of NaN, highlighting that 愁云使者 may be more central to their team's team fighting capacity than 披甲龙龟. This observation is largely caused by the difference in kills.

愁云使者 usually has a slightly larger longest killing spree than their enemy does. Commonly, they takes less damage than 披甲龙龟. This typically indicates differing health capacities, but it can also indicate that the champ with higher HP has less mobility and thus is not able to escape further damage when engaged or poked.

championDifferences.title

伤害数据

愁云使者
披甲龙龟
物理伤害
魔法伤害
真实伤害

championDifferences.playStyle.title

愁云使者
披甲龙龟

championDifferences.whoIsBetter

Both League of Legends champions are great champions. Both champs have their strengths, weaknesses, and counters. In the game's current meta, 愁云使者 usually loses when playing against 披甲龙龟, with a 47.1% win rate. As a result, 愁云使者 makes a poor counter to 披甲龙龟.

While 愁云使者 does have a lower winrate than 披甲龙龟, when facing one another, 愁云使者 also has a much lower learning curve that makes them a less time consuming character to pick up and master. You should be very concerned when picking 愁云使者 into 披甲龙龟.

Furthermore, 愁云使者 also has some amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to 披甲龙龟. This often makes her just as valuable during team fights, especially when facing champions with a lot of burst damage.

While there is not a single best champion in League of Legends, in 愁云使者 vs 披甲龙龟 matchups, 披甲龙龟 is the better champ with a lower win rate, less champion complexity, and a similar amount of utility to help out your team members during late stage team fights.

愁云使者 is a terribly counter to 披甲龙龟. Make sure you focus your gameplay on maximizing your gold income and clearing objectives. If you are able to do that, you should be able to stand on your own as 愁云使者 against 披甲龙龟.

additionalInformation.title

method.title2

method.text2

additionalInformation.resources

additionalInformation.readMore

If you would like to truly master 愁云使者 to counter 披甲龙龟 during both the early game and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should continue reading to learn a few extra tricks and insights into this matchup. If you listen to the build and stats shown above, you should grow your win rate by a lot and be closer to League of Legends pro players.

愁云使者 most often racks up much more CS compared to 披甲龙龟. Champions who on average don't get many minion kills usualy don't require much CS to be valuable teammates, such as supports. These kinds of champions are capable of scaling well off of their skills, stats, and first items alone. Yet, champs with large amounts of CS, such as hyper-carries, typically need several high cost items to be effective. In either case, try to surpass the numbers reported here to do well.

The most important items to prioritize in your 愁云使者 versus 披甲龙龟 build include 灭世者的死亡之帽, 风暴狂涌, and 卢登的伙伴. When 愁云使者 bought at least these three items in their build, they performed much better against 披甲龙龟 than with most other common counter builds. In fact, 愁云使者 had an average winrate of 47.1% when countering 披甲龙龟 with these items in their kit.

To have the greatest likelihood of crushing 披甲龙龟 as 愁云使者, you should use the 电刑, 血之滋味, 眼球收集器, 终极猎人, 法力流系带, and 超然 runes from the 主宰 and 巫术 rune sets. Of all the rune builds players chose for 愁云使者 vs 披甲龙龟 matchups, this composite of runes yielded the best win rate. Notably, these runes gave a 47.1% win rate overall.

By default, tips, statistics, and builds on how to beat 披甲龙龟 as 愁云使者 are given for all skill levels, merged. To filter the statistics and builds to an individual skill level, you can use the selection menu located earlier in the counter matchup guide.